Olympic Gold Rush
Posted on 07. Dec, 2009 by Kerry Banks in Fresh Trax, teaser
2010 WINTER OLYMPICS UPDATE
Although it is clearly not too difficult to design an Olympic clothing line that will make scads of money, impressing the critics is a different matter entirely, as Hudson’s Bay is finding out
by Kerry Banks
Back in 2005, HBC defeated Roots and Lululemon to win the bidding war for the athletic wear sponsorship for the next four Olympic games (2006 Torino Winter Games, 2008 Beijing Olympics, 2010 Vancouver Winter Games, and 2012 London Olympics). For this privilege, HBC forked over a hefty $100 million.
However, the Canadian Olympic clothing that HBC produced for Beijing in 2008 met with scathing reviews: “garish,” “loud,” “psychedelia run amok,” were just some of the reactions. In its company blog, Lululemon dubbed HBC’s sartorial stylings the “vomit pajama line.”
Chastened by that reception, HBC opted for a more conservative approach with its 2010 Winter Olympic consumer line, which is based on four distinctly Canadian items: the parka, toque, knitted sweater and buffalo plaid. Even so, the company still managed to spark controversy. After surveying surveyed the line of red, white, black and grey clothing, Vancouver Liberal MP Hedy Fry thought she spotted a partisan conspiracy, comparing the HBC’s official Olympic log, (a black ‘C’ with a red maple leaf in the centre) to the logo for the Conservative Party (a slanted blue ‘C’ with a red maple leaf in the middle). Others felt it was a direct rip-off of the Royal Canadian Air Force’s logo—a red maple leaf inside a black ‘C.’
It turns out, the HBC was sensitive enough to the similarity between its new logo and the military logo that it called in its lawyers for a meeting to determine that they were, in fact, different enough. As Hudson Bay’s fashion director Suzanne Timmins told Canadian Press, “When you’re dealing with the maple leaf, red, white, black, you’re going to come across a lot of different logos that are very close to other people’s logos.”

"Cowichan First Nation officials accused HBC of stealing their iconic sweater design after rejecting their proposal to produce Cowichan sweaters for HBC's line of 2010 Olympic clothing."
But there was more flak to come. Cowichan First Nation officials accused the retail giant of stealing their iconic sweater design after rejecting their proposal to produce Cowichan sweaters for HBC’s line of 2010 Olympic clothing. (HBC’s $350 Olympic sweater – featuring a maple leaf and elk — has become one of the clothing line’s most popular items since it was unveiled in October.) Hudson’s Bay initially dismissed the comparison, insisting its hand-knit sweater was not a Cowichan, and that the Vancouver Island band couldn’t meet the company’s production requirements to be an official supplier in any event. But after being threatened with legal action and public protests, HBC changed its tune. The company is now close to finalizing a deal with the band that will likely see Cowichan sweaters sold in Hudson’s Bay Company’s Olympic superstore in downtown Vancouver and in an aboriginal pavilion during the Games.
Meanwhile, the media’s reaction to the HBC’s Winter Olympic line appears to be lukewarm. Macleans magazine dubbed it “banal, but wearable.” The Globe and Mail declared: “These are items that have been designed to sell. Even if some Canadians are left cold by the nostalgic knitwear, foreigners will likely regard the pieces as quaint and worth buying as stylish souvenirs. Where the apparel comes up short is originality.” Chris Rudge, boss of the Canadian Olympic Committee, was more enthusiastic. He said the clothing “screams Canada” and is “bold, inspiring, modern, contemporary and cool.” Even so, “bold and “contemporary” do not seem to be the appropriate adjectives for designs that HBC fashion director Suzanne Timmins admits were inspired by the 1970s Crazy Canucks alpine ski team and the classic Canadian comedy show SCTV, featuring Bob and Doug McKenzie. She also noted that designers decided not to go with seal-skin trim, as requested by Canadian MPs to support Canada’s seal hunting industry.

The total value of licensed Olympic merchandise sales worldwide is expected to top the $500-million mark by the time the Games end, resulting in about $54 million in revenues for VANOC.
Of course, despite what the fashion mavens think, the total value of licensed Olympic merchandise sales worldwide is expected to top the $500-million mark by the time the Games end, resulting in about $54 million in revenues for VANOC. And no one need shed any tears for American-owned HBC, with its 21,000 square-foot Olympic superstore on the main floor of its downtown location jam-packed with more than 1,000 pieces of officially licensed Games merchandise. The store also features a Coke cafe decked out in Coca-Cola colours, a pin wall that can hold 21,000 pins; a display of special-edition watches from the 2010 Winter Games and past Games presented by Swatch; a concierge service offered by Purolator to ship purchases to a customer’s hotel or anywhere in the world; and replica Olympic Torches presented by Bombardier. With the Winter Games still several months away, Hudson’s Bay has already struck gold.
To view all of HBC’s Winter Olympic designs: http://store.hbc.com
So, how do you feel about the HBC’s new line of Olympic clothing? Are these items that you would buy?
Photos: Kerry Banks




Jan
27. Dec, 2009
I find it hard to say just how much I dislike the HBC’s 2010 Olympic clothing line.
The sale of this three hundred year old Canadian company to American ownership was, to me, a visceral loss. It is, in my opinion, emblematic of the decay and decline of our own culture. We no longer preserve or invest in our own, and have placed everything worthwile about our country for sale to the highest bidder.
And the Olympic clothing lines produced by the HBC are the result: cheap-looking, embarrasing, pandering to … – well I’m not sure who they’re pandering to, but it doesn’t seem to be Canadians.
The 2010 line looks like the owners of HBC view Canadians as cheap north-of-the-49th trailer trash. In contrast to Roots who designed Olympic uniforms to make us proud (and whose owners btw were self-adopted Canadians).
Perhaps we could start a movement to bring back the Canadian Salt Lake City team uniforms for the 2010 Olympics. I’d donate to that cause.
Kerry Banks
13. Jan, 2010
You make some great points and I can’t dispute your review of the 2010 Olympic line. Interestingly though, HBC hired Tu Ly, the guy who designed the Team Canada uniforms for Roots that were so popular at past Winter Olympics.
john
21. Feb, 2010
Nice one Karen. I think Jan should have done a little more research before shooting her mouth off. The way this clothing is disappearing off the shelf is testament to how well it relates to Canadians. I think her bitternes about the ownership of HBC is ;skewing’ her opinion.She is definitely in the minority with her review.
Kerry Banks
22. Feb, 2010
There is no doubt that the clothing has been a merchandising smash. Hudson’s Bay recently extended the hours at its downtown Olympic Superstore. It is now open 24 hours a day!
Heather K.
23. Feb, 2010
I am really disappointed to see that the 2010 Olympic Apparel was made overseas. Considering the focus of the line is Canada it would have been more appropriate to have them made in Canada. Really takes away any pride you would have in wearing the item, knowing that each maple leaf was designed & sewed on by someone who had no appreciation for the symbol. I understand that it reduces costs by having these items made outside of the country, but when HBC is selling them at such a high markup, wouldn’t the money spent on production be better kept in our country? (Considering also our economy – should we not be supporting our own Nation by providing jobs and work here, rather than to an outside nation just to ’save a buck’). I understand that proceeds go to the athletes, and the more money HBC makes on these products, the more we support our athletes – but I believe keeping the production of the 2010 Olympic Apparel in Canada would have benefited both our athletes and our economy. Very, very disappointed – so much so that I will not be purchasing any of these products and I know many others feel the exact same way. Sad to think that I won’t have any keepsakes from this event – but there would be no sentimental value to them anyway considering they aren’t a symbol of Canada – just another cheap import.
We may have been ‘made for this’ – but it wasn’t made by or for us.